Confirmation bias for Christmas

…wrapped up in a layer of heartwarming and tied with a ribbon made of pure feel-good.

I’m a big fan of direct transfers — if we’re going to be either giving charitably to people or organizations or causes (or whatever), or supporting them via wealth transfers, I’d rather assume that they know better what they want to spend their money on than we do.  Furthermore, it seems to me that most of the proponents and critics of charity and entitlements come at them from a position of smug superiority — we can’t just give them money or they’ll spend it on hookers and blow, we have to make sure they spend it on what we know is best for them.  (The anti- position is “if we give them food stamps they’ll just spend their regular income on hookers and blow”, which at least has the benefit of noticing that money is fungible.)  Giving, in other words, is more about affirming the status of the giver than improving the welfare of the recipient.

So it warms the cold withered cockles of my — well, whatever a heartless libertarian uses to pump blood around — to discover that GiveDirectly simply gave people money.  And further, those people actually spent it on life-improving things — not that hookers and blow don’t make you feel good for a few hours at a time, but we’re talking about things like

 food and home improvements that can vastly improve quality of life, such as installing a weatherproof tin roof. Some families have invested in profit-bearing businesses, such as chicken-rearing, agriculture, or the vending of clothes, shoes, or charcoal.

It’s a natural experiment that affirms my preconceptions, but more importantly it actually makes people’s lives better.

Also, have some Korpiklaani.  It’s good for you.


1 Response to “Confirmation bias for Christmas”

  1. 1 kbiel
    December 26, 2012 at 08:38

    I’m also a fan of direct transfers. I’d much prefer to give my $385.35 a month wasted on social security directly to my grand parents. I would be better off, they would be better off, and my employer would be better off if they did not have to plug in their confiscation contribution as well.

Leave a reply; use raw HTML for markup. Please blockquote quotations from the post or other comments.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

anarchocapitalist agitprop

Be advised

I say fuck a lot



Statistics FTW


%d bloggers like this: