Chasing indicators, HDL edition

Derek Lowe wonders:

Spoiler warning: Not so much.

The authors have done large genome-wide association studies looking for polymorphisms that affect lipoproteins, and they’re following those up with clinical data on cardiovascular outcomes. Untangling the effects of HDL, LDL, triglycerides and other factors isn’t easy, but they did find one mutation that appears to raise HDL alone. Looking at the people carrying that one, they find that there’s no amelioration of risk in them at all. That’s as opposed to the mutations that lowered LDL levels, which were consistently associated with lower risks.

My mental model for lipoproteins and atherosclerosis is very much a simple-minded thing, but I’ve never come across a mechanism for HDL lowering risk.  Seems to me, then, that high HDL levels (or more likely low LDL:HDL ratios) are correlated with improved CV health, and the elevated HDL is an indicator of some other mechanism.  Trying to replicate the indicator — raising HDL, as with this mutation — doesn’t necessarily replicate the causal mechanism.


0 Responses to “Chasing indicators, HDL edition”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a reply; use raw HTML for markup. Please blockquote quotations from the post or other comments.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

anarchocapitalist agitprop

Be advised

I say fuck a lot



Statistics FTW


%d bloggers like this: