15
Aug
10

Income rank is a proxy

By now, everyone’s heard of The Spirit Level, and everyone who’s willing to listen has heard why it’s wrong.  Briefly: the argument is that absolute increases in wealth don’t matter so much, because people’s well-being is strongly affected by their relative status.  It doesn’t matter if you’re medically immortal and have everything you could possibly wish for, the hypothesis (when taken to a logical edge case) goes; if your neighbour makes more money than you do you’ll still be miserable and die an early and senseless death from a heroin overdose.

Reading the comments on Robin Hanson’s blog, I came across this gem of insight from commenter Rob:

“The rank-income hypothesis may explain why increasing the incomes of all may not raise the happiness of all… [I]ncome rank may act as a proxy for more general social rank, with the analyses then showing that social rank is key to well-being.”

(He’s quoting someone, but copied the above into the link target.)

So suppose that Puff the Magic Socialist waves his wand and brings everyone’s incomes to within noise of each other.  Everyone’s on the level, right?  No more envy?

Not hardly.

As Rob notes, income rank is a proxy for social rank.  If income rank goes away, we’ll find some other way to make ourselves miserable over petty status games.  (See also: high school.)

I suspect that the people agitating for “less income inequality” have convinced themselves that the new social-rank proxy metric will be something that favours them.

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Income rank is a proxy”


  1. August 15, 2010 at 19:45

    “If income rank goes away, we’ll find some other way to make ourselves miserable over petty status games.” Oh dear gawd yes. Because it goes much, much deeper than income. The desire for status rooted in our genes. If income rank goes away, we’ll find some other way to make ourselves miserable over petty status games. All social animals obsess about status. When I throw food out to our backyard chicken flock nothing looks tastier to a bird than the bit of food in her neighbor’s mouth. A hen will drop a hunk of beef (ordinarily considered by the girls to be the top tier of gourmet chicken fare) to steal a measly bit of carrot peel from her rival.

    Dog in a manger anyone?


Leave a reply; use raw HTML for markup. Please blockquote quotations from the post or other comments.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


anarchocapitalist agitprop

Be advised

I say fuck a lot

Categories

Archives

Statistics FTW


%d bloggers like this: