05
Jul
09

Planes, trains, and automobiles

Traveling by car may be long and tedious, but it does leave one in control of one’s own destiny.  Last year, confronted with flooding in southern Wisconsin, my parents drove to a family reunion in Iowa by way of northern Illinois.  Seven months previously, Northwest Airlines reacted to an unexpected snowstorm over the Rocky Mountains by canceling every flight related to those delayed.

Long-time readers of this blog will recall that I am no particular fan of air travel.  Travel by car is, in a transcontinental sense, often somewhat inconvenient.  It gives me some sour satisfaction to discover that trains are no better.

(Hat tip: Jalopnik)

It does make it somewhat easier to face the prospect of a day wasted in air travel tomorrow somewhat easier to face.


2 Responses to “Planes, trains, and automobiles”


  1. 1 aczarnowski
    July 7, 2009 at 06:46

    Every time we think about a traveling vacation we try the “let’s see if we could take the train” dance. We really want to take trains. The idea of train travel is very, very cool. And Euro trains mostly live up to that mystique.

    But each time we give it a go it’s obvious in about five minutes Amtrak makes no travel sense.

    That sucks.

  2. July 7, 2009 at 18:55

    I prever to drive, but make an exception for extremely long, cross-country trips. And I know, unless you’re an American, Canadian, Australian, or handful of other exceptions, the idea of a “long trip” within hte borders of one nation is foreign to you.


Leave a Reply




anarchocapitalist agitprop

Be advised

I say fuck a lot
Grammar Nazi

Categories

Archives

Statistics FTW