One of my hypotheses for the ongoing death of the newspaper industry — at least in the form we recognize — is that its costs are huge. It takes a lot of money to lay out, print, and distribute hundreds of thousands or millions of physical newspapers — particularly compared to online news. But the relative cost of printing and distributing a newspaper pales in comparison to the cost of fixing a mistake once the paper is in distribution. Case in point:
- blog post subhead large (lies.com)
(Hat tip: Megan McArdle)
When I fuck up a post on Blunt Object, it’s trivially easy for me to go back and fix it. What’s the L.A. Times going to do about this? What can they do?

0 Responses to “On the death of dead-tree news, part <em>i+1</em>”