Archive for May, 2008

31
May
08

The real force behind high gas prices

It is easily seen that government interference in a complex and competitive market makes things go fucko bazoo.  Furthermore, upgefuckedness increases proportionally to government power, government scope, market complexity, and market competitiveness.  With this in mind, we consider the following story:

[U]nlike the customers rolling up to the station’s pumps this week, resigned to the fact that their wallets were about to take a beating, Rocky Twyman and company had a plan to bring that number tumbling down.

They would ask God to do it.

[...]

Some would say the proof of whether Twyman has the ear of the Almighty is in the result. On the first day of the movement, April 23, the national average price of a gallon of unleaded was $3.53, according to AAA. As of yesterday, it was $3.96.

Given the nature of external interference in a complex market, this counts as the most exciting empirical evidence for the existence of God in recorded history.  The biggest surprise to this story is that gas prices haven’t increased further, since the power (omniscience means the kind of ubiquitous surveillance that would give Gordon Brown an instantly fatal case of priapism; omnipotence speaks for itself) and the scope (the whole of creation, to include the rest of the universe and presumably — if the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics holds — all possible universes) of God’s government are so far beyond even the Soviet Union as to beggar belief.

30
May
08

Conference blogging: hopeful audacity

(Do pardon the title: I can’t seem to curb my cynicism over the upcoming Presidential election.)

I’m attending the final talk at AI/GI/CRV/IS/LMNOP 2008.  The speaker, a division chief at NASA’s Ames Research Centre, just claimed that by 2015 or so NASA will have replaced the Shuttles with “new vehicles”, capable of making routine trips to not just the ISS but the moon, and later to Mars.  Now I’m watching a video detailing the concept.  That is cooler than a bottle of tequila riding a motorcycle.

In other local news, whatever Windsor gives away in coffee shops it more than makes up in bars.  There are some really good places to drink just a few blocks from campus.  Decent food, good atmosphere, and a wide variety of reasonably-priced beers.  This is the sort of thing I miss about Edmonton.

29
May
08

Democracy: you’re doing it wrong

The first priority of government is power: keeping what it has and taking what it can get away with. Other things — things that matter to the people the government claims to represent, like defending a nation’s borders or maintaining a city’s streets — come a distant second, no matter what politicians will tell you on the campaign trail. Consider yet another example:

The European Union assembly’s political establishment is pushing through changes that will silence dissidents by changing the rules allowing Euro-MPs to form political groupings.

Richard Corbett, a British Labour MEP, is leading the charge to cut the number of party political tendencies in the Parliament next year, a move that would dissolve UKIP’s pan-European Eurosceptic “Independence and Democracy” grouping.

Under the rule change, the largest and most pro-EU groups would tighten their grip on the Parliament’s political agenda and keep control of lavish funding.

Of course, Corbett isn’t trying to stifle democratic opinion that threatens to reduce the power to which he has access. No, Corbett has the people’s best interests at heart:

”It would prevent single issue politicians from being given undue support from the public purse,” said Mr Corbett.

”We want to avoid the formation of a fragmented Parliament, deeply divided into many small groups and unable to work effectively.”

I would expect a fragmented Parliament, deeply divided and unable to work effectively, to have a most salutary effect upon the EU — people would be able to get things done without übergovernmental interference. Notice, however, Corbett’s rationale: he claims that the new rules would prevent the “public purse” from being wasted on what he dismisses as “single issue politicians”. He neglects to mention that funding not given to Euroskeptics would instead be given to people like… him.

“Euroskeptics”, of course, are unimpressed:

Nigel Farage, leader of the UK Independence Party, claimed that the move goes hand in hand with the denial of popular votes on the new EU Treaty.

”Welcome to your future. This shows an EU mindset that is arrogant, anti-democratic and frankly scary,” he said.

”These people are so scared of public opinion they are willing to set in stone the right to ignore it. Freedom requires the governing elite to be held to account. They must be getting very worried if they are enacting such dictatorial powers for themselves.”

Arrogant? The EU? Never!

28
May
08

Oppal acknowledges flawed bill, but misses the point

Some of you will remember Wally Oppal’s effort to muzzle the BC electorate.  The issue, of course, is that freedom of speech is not something one can casually discard when it becomes distressing.  Bill 42 would have restricted election advertising by third-party groups during BC’s 28-day campaign and for 120 days before.  Oppal seems surprised that people don’t like the idea, but has acknowledged that the bill has flaws and claims to be willing to compromise.

Oppal admitted the original proposal might have been too restrictive and it touched off a “vigorous debate.”

“I think we ran something up the flagpole and it didn’t fly like we thought it would,” the attorney general told reporters.

Unfortunately, he’s missed the fucking point again.  The trouble with Bill 42 is that it limits political speech.  Oppal’s compromise, however, addresses the length, rather than the scope, of the restriction:

“We think that the ban here is more reasonable. I think that when you looked at the 120 days it could be argued and a court could say that the principle is sound, but the length of the period is inordinate and it’s an infringement on freedom of speech, and I think that’s the reason why we compromised.”

Right.  Limit the restriction to 60 days and it suddenly stops being an infringement?  Censorship isn’t censorship if you don’t do it as much?  How does that work?  The problem is the existence of the spending cap, not its duration.

28
May
08

Conference blogging: inception

This is the first time I’ve taken a laptop to a conference; I’m typing away as David Ebert graciously slams video games at the beginning of his keynote talk.  It feels… right, somehow.

I’m also sipping some truly awful coffee.  (It was free, at least, and worth every penny.)  Bad coffee provided for free at conferences is a predictable phenomenon; the problem is that there’s no good coffee available, not even burnt-to-carbon coffee with faux italian names.  I find myself wishing there was a Starbucks around.  This stuff makes me think I filled up with hot water by mistake.

28
May
08

Mid-week misanthropy, vol. 5

Since I’m attending the 2008 AI/GI/CRV/IS/LMNOP conference this week, your regularly-scheduled mid-week misanthropy is travelling through time: written on Monday, posted when I get around to it. (Just kidding. If time travel were that easy, I’d already have my doctorate… and it’d probably be in physics.)


We begin, appropriately enough, at Vancouver international airport, where everyone freaked way the fuck out over a ten-centimetre pocket knife.

Security staff spotted the knife on an X-ray machine around 10 a.m. but not until the passenger had already collected the bag and walked into the secure area of the domestic terminal. At least 10 domestic flights were grounded for the next hour and a half while staff searched for the passenger and the knife.

Any mildly interested individual could spot a dozen makeshift weapons more effective than a 10cm pocket knife available for easy purchase on the “secure” side of security… within ten minutes. This is equal parts fear-mongering and security theatre, as you’re all probably tired of hearing by now (but I’m not going to shut up until conditions improve).

Furthermore, I’m persuaded that it’s nearly impossible to hijack an airplane these days. Post 2001-Sept-11, enough passengers are going to assume that they’re headed for a gruesome, fiery death anyway to retake control of the plane a la Flight 93. In short, it no longer matters whether hijackers carry box cutters or submachine guns: passengers who think they have nothing to lose will do whatever it takes to take the hijackers with them (if you’re going to Valhalla, you might as well have an honour guard). Certainly there’s no reason to fuck with thousands of people over someone’s Swiss Army Knife.


Speaking of presumptuous twats fucking with thousands of people over the illusion of security, we see further evidence this week that “health and safety experts” in what was once Great Britain have gone mad with power (or, perhaps, have simply gone mad):

Apparently, some conifers have pointy leaves. Who knew?

For 150 years, it has stood in splendid serenity on the village green, harming no one and pleasing many. Over the decades, the monkey puzzle tree at West Cross, near Swansea, became a much-loved local landmark. But now it is facing the chop … because, in modern Britain, the needle-like points of its leaves are deemed a danger to health and safety.

But what use is a little thing like 150 years of data when it comes to saving the poor pwecious chiwdwen?

One expert likened the effect of the needles to being pricked by a hypodermic syringe. ‘Every effort is made in this day and age to prevent children playing with discarded syringe needles,’ a report stated. ‘Every effort must be made to prevent children coming into contact with these potentially, equally sharp needles.’

It bothers me that people who reason thus are permitted to graduate from high school. Yes, discarded syringes are dangerous. Yes, we try to stop kids from playing with them because they are dangerous. However, dirty needles are dangerous because they’ve been contaminated with the blood of addicts, not because they’re pointy. You fail at syllogism, sir: get your arse back to class.


Let’s stay with the Daily Mail and the nanny state for another rant.

For nearly a quarter of a century, Lourdes Maxwell has celebrated the arrival of summer by putting a paddling pool in the garden. [...] Miss Maxwell’s local council has decided that the pool – which is only 2ft deep – needs a lifeguard.

[...]

After her MP intervened, the local authority softened its stance, saying Miss Maxwell could have a pool if she paid for insurance and ensured supervisors were on constant watch.

There’s nothing I can say about this bullshit that isn’t blindingly obvious. Still, what would you expect from a government so enamoured with its own power that it sends cops after five-year-olds who dare play hopscotch on a public sidewalk?


Let’s return to the purportedly free side of the Atlantic. You know, the one with the guns. And the hippies. And the gun-toting hippies.

Wait, what?

Seems someone interrupted a drum circle with a handgun, and — much to their credit — four people kicked that someone’s ass and held him down ’til police arrived.

This is, by and large, a fairy-tale ending. I’m including it in this week’s misanthropy for two reasons. One is to disparage this statement:

The gun fired at least once, witnesses said, the shot striking the woman in the thigh and the same shot apparently hitting the second victim’s hand.

Guns don’t “fire” by themselves. Guns “are fired” by “people”. Contrary to popular opinion, guns aren’t haunted devices, possessed by malicious demons which make otherwise decent people commit heinous murders: they are, rather, inanimate and inert chunks of metal (and usually wood and/or plastic) which only fire when some individual puts s/h/its booger-hook on the bang switch.

Second, I can’t help but laugh my fool ass off every time I read this:

One man got into the suspect’s face, screaming, “This is a peaceful event!”

It’s not every day that you encounter such a starkly defined self-parody.

And finally:


Right-wing nutjob of the week: Geraldine Ferraro

Yeah, you read that right. Ms. Ferraro wins this week’s RWNJotW award for attempting to stereotype Democrats as racist, sexist, or both. Even Rush Limbaugh shies away from that gambit:

Geraldine Ferraro, the only woman to run on a major party presidential ticket and a supporter of Hillary Clinton, has accused Barack Obama of conducting a “terribly sexist” campaign. Miss Ferraro, the losing Democratic candidate for vice-president in 1984, said that she might abandon her lifelong party loyalties and vote for the Republican John McCain if Mr Obama is confirmed as the nominee.

There has surely been a great deal of sexism in this campaign. It’s the nature of the beast: the Democrats have done their level best to destroy their own party with a conflict of equally compelling identities (“first woman president” vs. “first black president”). Tensions are high, and when tensions get that high people reach for the easiest insults available (witness the “bros before hoes” t-shirt and the Obama ‘08 monkey t-shirt, for example). When dismally unimaginative people feel the need to attack Senator Clinton, they seize upon her sex.

Of course, when dismally unimaginative people feel the need to attack Senator Obama, they seize upon his race. (See, for example, the West Virginia and Kentucky primaries.) This includes Senator Clinton’s campaign staff, who’ve circulated photos showing Obama in what they called “his native dress” and fired up the inevitable rumours that Obama’s a Muslim (“his middle name’s Hussein, for gawd’s sake, and his last name sounds an awful lot like Osama“).

At best, this is a case of the pot calling the kettle… uh, that got uncomfortable quickly.

Go, identity politics, go! (And don’t come back!)

26
May
08

I’ve been upstaged by the CBC

Honestly, what am I supposed to add to an article entitled thus?

I suppose it’s interesting to note that my neighbourhood’s just as likely as any other to appear on Fark.com.  Doesn’t do much for my sense of community, though.

23
May
08

Search string follies

Yeah, I know, blogging about search strings is a lame way to generate content, but I couldn’t pass this up.  Someone found Blunt Object by searching:

“are cheetos made with bull semen”

No.  No, they aren’t.  Cheetos are made with taxpayer-subsidized corn.  Lattes are made with bull semen.

I hope this clears things up.




anarchocapitalist agitprop

Be advised

I say fuck a lot
Grammar Nazi

Categories

Archives

Statistics FTW